Reviewer resources

REVIEWER RESOURCES

Overview

AGU’s journals rely on reviewers who are experts in their field to help maintain the highest standards and timeliness of our publications, and to maximize the impact of authors’ research. The peer review process is the cornerstone of scientific inquiry and is vital to ensuring the credibility of research and advancing human knowledge. All reviewers are expected to uphold our ethical guidelines and to disclose any conflicts of interest to the editors. Reviewers are expected to keep manuscripts confidential.

Guidelines for reviewers

Our peer review process is managed in the Geophysical Electronic Manuscript Submission system (GEMS). You will receive an email with a link requesting a review. New reviewers will need to update their profile in the GEMS system (this is separate from your profile on AGU.org).

The most helpful peer reviews summarize the main contribution of the paper, its appropriateness for the journal and any major revisions required. Minor suggestions or edits are best listed separately. If you prefer, you can upload a file with your review and/or an annotated manuscript. You may also take advantage of the online manuscript annotation tool hypothes.is.

It is important to meet the review deadline but if you are unable, contact the journal staff immediately. Extensions are granted at the editor’s discretion. Please submit your review online using the link provided in the emails.

Final decisions on acceptance or rejection are made by the editors. You will be informed promptly of the final decision.

Looking up to canaopy of pine trees
  • When you log into GEMS, the manuscript you have agreed to review will be under Reviewer Tasks and marked with a red arrow. After clicking the link, you will be presented with reviewer instructions, manuscript details and files, and a review form
  • You can change your profile and/or update areas of expertise by selecting Modify Profile/Password, under General Tasks, at the bottom of your GEMS home page
  • We will add your review service to your ORCID profile with your permission. Simply register for an ORCID and/or link it to your GEMS profile. We also recognize reviewers throughout the year with awards and service subscriptions.
Earth
Research vessel in front of iceberg in Greenland

Review criteria for Geophysical Research Letters

GRL asks reviewers to evaluate both scientific content and presentation quality to meet GRL standards

Review criteria for Earth and
Space Science

Earth and Space Science asks reviewers to consider a number of questions regarding the paper, as well as its conclusion and impact
Review Criteria

Review criteria

Review criteria for all AGU journals includes questions on research significance, methods, data and its availability, appropriate referencing, presentation, and key points.

Contacts

AGU Staff Headshot Hanson

Brooks Hanson

Executive Vice President, Science

| [email protected]

AGU Staff Headshot Lunn

Jenny Lunn

Director, Publications

| [email protected]

AGU Staff Headshot Panning

Jeanette Panning

Director, Publications

| [email protected]

image

Randy Townsend

Sr. Program Manager, Publications Operations

| [email protected]

AGU Staff Headshot Wooden

Paige Wooden

Sr. Program Manager, Publications Statistics

| [email protected]